Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of global biochar mitigation potential

By K. Pratt, D. Moran. 2010

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67d5b2cf3fd5a798da48bd395cfd4c7647269b02

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. Felix Creutzig
2. Pete Smith
3. Gregory F. Nemet
4. Wenshan Guo
5. G. Van Huylenbroeck
6. Joeri Rogelj
7. Mohammad Boshir Ahmed
8. H. Ngo

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Gregory F. Nemet
2. G. Van Huylenbroeck
3. Joeri Rogelj
4. Felix Creutzig
5. W. Lamb
6. J. Minx

In Pollution

1. Mohammad Boshir Ahmed
2. John L. Zhou
3. Wenshan Guo
4. H. Ngo
5. Gregory F. Nemet
6. G. Van Huylenbroeck
7. J. Buysse
8. W. Lamb

Citations in the corpus

• Cost‐benefit analysis of using biochar to improve cereals agriculture (2015, methodology): “Implementing biochar as method of carbon sequestration could dramatically increase its value if any reasonable price for capturing GHG emissions emerges in future markets (Pratt & Moran, 2010; Roberts et al., 2010).”
• Distributed biochar and bioenergy coproduction: a regionally specific case study of environmental benefits and economic impacts (2013, methodology): “…of biochar production systems varies depending on the feedstock used (Lin & Hwang, 2009; Roberts et al., 2010), the conversion technology employed (Pratt & Moran, 2010; Brown et al., 2011), or the inclusion of carbon credits reflecting the social value of GHG mitigation (Pratt & Moran, 2010;…”
• Insight into biochar properties and its cost analysis (2016, background): “Thermal treatment can be performed with different final temperatures and with different heating rates which are responsible for the quality and prices of the BCs [16, 27].”
• Green grabs and biochar: Revaluing African soils and farming in the new carbon economy (2012, background): “Others who are reacting against this dystopia less reject the technology, than argue that biochar could be made beneficial for small, rural farmers if technologies for the production and application of biochar on a small, local scale, from local biowaste, are developed and encouraged (Pratt and Mora”
• Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, background): “…potentials are generally found in studies of future biochar applications rising from 1–1.8 GtCO2 yr −1 in 2030 (Lomax et al 2015, Paustian et al 2016, Pratt and Moran 2010, Griscom et al 2017), 1.8–4.8 GtCO2 yr −1 in 2050 (Powell and Lenton 2012, Smith 2016, Moore et al 2010), and 2.6– 4.8 GtCO2…”