DISPERSAL DISTANCE OF MAMMALS IS PROPORTIONAL TO HOME RANGE SIZE

By J. Bowman, Jochen A. G. Jaeger, L. Fahrig. 2002

394 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67c58851508fc49405868060dc1f039ee0e3733d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

FOREST COVER INFLUENCES DISPERSAL DISTANCE OF WHITE-TAILED DEER (2005, background): “Some dispersal investigations have examined differences in dispersal distances among taxa (Bowman 2003; Bowman et al. 2002; Paradis et al. 1998), but plasticity of dispersal distances within vertebrate species has rarely been examined, and dispersal distances for a given species are often modeled…”
Landscape and patch attributes impacting medium- and large-sized terrestrial mammals in a fragmented rain forest (2013, background): “Thus, because MDD of most medium- and large-sized terrestrial mammals of the region ranges between 1000 and 4000 m (Bowman et al. 2002, Sutherland et al. 2000, Thornton et al. 2011b), the selected landscape sizes are adequate; i.e. 100- ha landscapes should allow evaluating the response of species…”
Ecological correlates of dispersal distance in terrestrial mammals (2013, methodology): “In addition, species of the same sizemay bemore or less vagile for reasons unrelated to diet, and this affects both their home range and dispersal distance (Bowman et al., 2002).”
Resistance and resilience: quantifying relative extinction risk in a diverse assemblage of Australian tropical rainforest vertebrates (2009, background): “…for long distance dispersal An index based on the sum of the following characteristics, which are known to influence capability for dispersal (Bowman et al ., 2002; Bowman, 2003; Charrette et al ., 2006), was calculated for each species: flight (yes = 1, no = 0); known movements from the…”
Does size matter for dispersal distance (2007, background): “Though allometry is well-known for other traits (e.g. metabolic rate, etc.), allometry of dispersal distance has only recently been analysed for birds and mammals (Sutherland et al. , 2000; Bowman et al. , 2002).”
Body size affects the spatial scale of habitat–beetle interactions (2005, background): “Bowman et al. (2002) controlled for the relationship between”
Maintaining tiger connectivity and minimizing extinction into the next century: Insights from landscape genetics and spatially-explicit simulations (2017, methodology): “A negative exponential function (Sutherland et al. 2000) with median dispersal distance of 85 km (Bowman et al. 2002) and two different maximum dispersal distances of 300km (Patil et al. 2011) and 500km (Bowman et al. 2002; Natesh et al. 2017) was used to model natal dispersal.”
Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges (2010, background): “To define the appropriate spatial scale, researchers mostly rely on available ecological and demographic information on movement and dispersal distances (Sutherland et al. 2000; Bowman et al. 2002).”
Aspects of cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) biology, ecology and conservation strategies on Namibian farmlands (2002, background): “Although one cheetah moved a long distance following translocation, which would be expected as movement after translocation has been reported as being proportional to home range size (Bowman et al. 2002), overall translocation seemed to have little effect on movement parameters, and there was no dif”
CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES (2005, background): “…the following assumptions: (1) area requirements scale to the size of the animal (larger animals require more habitat), (2) larger animals disperse further than smaller animals (Bowman et al. 2002), (3) birds disperse further than mammals, and (4) mammals disperse further than amphibians/reptiles.”
Do species life history traits explain population responses to roads? A meta-analysis (2012, background): “Species mobility information for mammals was indexed as home range area (ha) (Bowman et al., 2002) and for birds as territory size (ha) (Bowman, 2003).”
Is dispersal distance of birds proportional to territory size (2003, background): “They further demonstrated that for mammals, homerange size is a better predictor of dispersal distance than is body mass. Bowman et al. (2002) argued that behaviour and physiology affect the vagility of mammals independently of body mass, such that these two indices of movement (dispersal distance…”