Methods for estimating dispersal probabilities and related parameters using marked animals
By R. Bennetts, James D. Nichols, R. Pradel, J. Lebreton, W. Kitchens. 2001
99 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/676e0f297e62a8eda6cb2d03038cafed4bb8440c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- H. Rydin
- T. Mcdonald
- C. Chetkiewicz
- Tord Snäll
- M. Boyce
- Eric S. Long
- Steven C. Amstrup
- Bryan F. J. Manly
Citations in the corpus
- Corridors for Conservation: Integrating Pattern and Process (2006, background): “Subsequent recaptures, resightings, or recovery provide an estimation of movement rates (reviewed by Bennetts et al. 2001).”
- Spatial occurrence and colonisations in patch‐tracking metapopulations: local conditions versus dispersal (2003, background): “Animal ecologists often adopt mark, release, re-capture studies over extensive areas (Bennetts et al. 2001).”
- FOREST COVER INFLUENCES DISPERSAL DISTANCE OF WHITE-TAILED DEER (2005, methodology): “However, many aspects of the transfer phase of dispersal remain poorly understood (Andreassen et al. 2002), associated with logistical problems of collecting data on movement paths of dispersing animals (Bennetts et al. 2001).”
- Handbook of Capture-Recapture Analysis (2010, methodology): “Some joint models have been developed already (Freeman et al. 1992; Burnham 1993; Barker 1997, 1999; Powell et al. 2000, Besbeas et al. 2002, 2003) and others have been proposed (e.g., Bennetts et al. 2001; Nichols and Hines 2002).”