Web Ontology Language: OWL
By Grigoris Antoniou, Frank van Harmelen. 2004
1,592 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Douwe Kiela
- Maximilian Nickel
- Roberto Navigli
- Olivier Bodenreider
- Bijan Parsia
- J. Hendler
- Michele Missikoff
- Antonio De Nicola
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Billy Pik Lik Lau
- Robert Stevens
- Chau Yuen
- J. Hendler
- Bijan Parsia
- Maximilian Nickel
- Roberto Navigli
- Dana S. Nau
In Information Systems
- Robert Stevens
- Chau Yuen
- J. Hendler
- Bijan Parsia
- Maximilian Nickel
- Roberto Navigli
- Dana S. Nau
- Douwe Kiela
Citations in the corpus
- A survey of data fusion in smart city applications (2019, background): “To date, there are few common ontology languages have been developed such as Delivery Context (DCN) [231], Web Ontology Language (OWL) [232], Resource Description Framework Schema (RDFS) [233], Semantic Sensor Network (SSN) [234], and others.”
- Automating DAML-S Web Services Composition Using SHOP2 (2003, background): “Semantic Web languages, such as the Web Ontology Language (OWL) [ 1 ] or DAML+OIL[2], provide the foundations for such sufficiently rich descriptions.”
- Learning Continuous Hierarchies in the Lorentz Model of Hyperbolic Geometry (2018, methodology): “In comparative linguists, evolutionary trees are used to describe the origin of languages (Campbell, 2013), while ontologies are used to provide rich categorizations of entities in semantic networks (Antoniou & Van Harmelen, 2004).”
- A software engineering approach to ontology building (2009, methodology): “This structuring process is carried out according to OPAL [12,14] ,a n ontology representation methodology developed at LEKS, IASI-CNR, based on UML and OWL [ 15 ].”
- Constraint driven Web service composition in METEOR-S (2004, methodology): “Th e RosettaNet schema language is a Document Type Definition (DTD) but we have converted a po rtion of it into Web Ontology Language (OWL) [18] for greater precision.”
- Bio-ontologies: current trends and future directions (2006, background): “OWL actually comes in three varieties of decreasing expressivity but of increasing tractability: OWL Full, OWL DL and OWL Lite [50].”