Bio-ontologies: current trends and future directions

408 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Biomedical Ontologies in Action: Role in Knowledge Management, Data Integration and Decision Support (2008, background): “A number of recent reviews have presented the major biomedical ontologies to various audiences, most often with an emphasis on their design and structural characteristics, mentioning their use only in passing [6-11].”
Biomedical ontologies: a functional perspective (2007, background): “The content-oriented view has been addressed well in prior reviews [13–15], describing the activities of individuals and Corresponding author.”
From brain maps to cognitive ontologies: informatics and the search for mental structure (2015, methodology): “Poldrack et al. (2012) first performed topic modeling on the text from the Neurosynth database using a technique known as latent Dirichlet allocation (Blei et al. 2003).”
The Open Biomedical Annotator (2009, background): “The research community agrees that ontologies are essential for data integration and translational discoveries to occur.([3]) However, the variety of biomedical data is very large and the data are often annotated with free text metadata by the researcher who created the dataset.”