What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods
By A. McVittie, D. Moran. 2004
228 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d37ce593ebf6d1fbd9f881a91a04b95028cc7ecf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Public attitudes towards the environmental impact of salmon aquaculture in Scotland (2006, methodology): “One advantage of the AHP methodology is that compared to other multi-criterion techniques it imposes less cognitive burden on respondents, since the evaluation process is broken down into a series of relatively simple binary comparisons between just two objectives ( Hall et al., 2004 ).”
- Multifunctionality of Agriculture:A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments (2007, background): “For more formal representations of jointness see among others Vatn (2002) and Havlik et al. (2005). Buysse et al.”
- Measuring private transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemes (2009, background): “2004 ), many farmers still attach a high symbolic value to production oriented activities and believe their status depends on this (Burton 2004 ).”