Economic Analysis , Moral Philosophy and Public Policy
By Daniel M. Hausman, M. Mcpherson. 2006
311 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66ed4543671fe2958da884488e1c03c8a0fcf390
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Tim Schwanen
- R. H. M. Pereira
- David Banister
- Martin F. Quaas
- I. Gough
- Stefan Baumgärtner
- M. Fourcade
- Kieran Healy
Citations in the corpus
- Moral Views of Market Society (2007, background): “First, economic theory is built on assumptions whose implicit moral content can be drawn out in detail (Hausman & McPherson 2006).”
- What is Sustainability Economics (2010, background): “7 The liberal premise of modern economics that individual preferences cannot be criticized but are to be accepted when formulating individual-based societal goals, can be challenged on ethical grounds (e.g. Sen, 1979, 1999; Hausman and McPherson, 2006).”
- Distributive justice and equity in transportation (2016, background): “…equally share some fundamental rights (e.g. to one’s own life and property) and the freedom to choose how to lead one’s life according to one’s values and goals, without interference by the state or others, provided the rights of others to do the same are respected (Hausman & McPherson, 2006).”
- Climate change and sustainable welfare: the centrality of human needs (2015, background): “However, it then encounters severe problems in aggregating utilities across people (Hausman and McPherson, 2006).2 Fourth, according to the neoclassical theory of consumption, there are no necessary limits to preferences and desires (Guillen Royo, 2007; O’Neill, 2011).”
- Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance (2013, unknown): “…life.1 Our position in this paper is consistent with many scholars who have criticized the trend in economic thought, influential in an array of literatures (including management), that has brought a narrowing in conceptions of value (Hausman & McPherson, 2006: 133; Satz, 2010: 60; Sen, 1998).”