Life-cycle analysis on energy consumption and GHG emission intensities of alternative vehicle fuels in China

By Xunmin Ou, Xiaoyu Yan, Xiliang Zhang, Zhen Liu. 2012

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

China’s electric vehicle subsidy scheme: Rationale and impacts (2014, unknown): “Several studies further investigated the effect of alternative vehicle penetration on the energy consumption and emissions of the whole vehicle fleet at a macro level (Al-Ghandoor, 2013; Al-Ghandoor et al., 2012; Geng et al., 2013; Hang et al., 2013; Hao et al., 2014a, 2011b, 2010, 2012; Ou et al., ”
The optimal CO2 emissions reduction path in Jiangsu province: An expanded IPAT approach (2013, background): “The current coal-based pathway of electricity production is an especially large contributor of greenhouse-gas emission [9].”
The impacts of carbon tax on energy intensity and economic growth – A dynamic evolution analysis on the case of China (2013, background): “emissions and energy intensity to a great extent [4–9], so that the objectives of protecting the environment [10] and a global warming limit of 2 C or below [11] can be achieved, which are conducive to the sustainable development of ecological economy and global economy [12].”