Perspectives on Policy Analysis: A Framework for Understanding and Design

By Igor S. Mayer, CE van Daalen, Bots P.W.G.G.. 2004

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: location and content in policy advisory systems (2012, background): “…France (Rochet, 2004), Germany (Fleischer, 2009), Canada (Howlett and Newman, 2010), and others, however, all emphasised the different sources and configurations of advisory actors and influence found in policy formulation in those countries (see also Glynn et al., 2003, and Mayer et al., 2004).”
Policy analysis and policy work in federal systems: Policy advice and its contribution to evidence-based policy-making in multi-level governance systems (2010, background): “In terms of the six styles of policy analysis identified by Mayer et al. (2004) in their comparative study of policy analytical styles, the predominant sets of analysts identified in the sub-national analysis reported above can be thought of as working in an interactive ‘‘client-advice’’ style…”
The Gaming of Policy and the Politics of Gaming: A Review (2009, background): “…public policy analysis , that is, the use of analytical methods derived from the social sciences to support public policy making and public policy makers in nondefense policy domains (see Brewer & deLeon, 1983; Dunn, 1981, 1994; Hogwood & Gunn, 1984; Mayer, van Daalen, & Bots, 2004; Parsons, 1996).”