Social and Cognitive Correlates of Utah Residents' Acceptance of the Lethal Control of Wolves
By Jeremy T. Bruskotter, Jerry J. Vaske, R. H. Schmidt. 2009
129 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66ae1e2c78925476f5d7e8cc8435afefca3e3090
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Genetics
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Learning to live with black bears: A psychological model of acceptance (2012, methodology): “Numerous studies have recognized this and measured not just the negative outcomes (or risks) associated with a species, but also the positive outcomes (or benefits) that people perceive (e.g., Bright and Manfredo 1996, Bruskotter et al. 2009).”
- Determining Where the Wild Things will be: Using Psychological Theory to Find Tolerance for Large Carnivores (2014, background): “, lethal control) (Bruskotter et al. 2009; Vaske et al. 2013) and carnivore populations (Riley & Decker 2000), as well as intentions to engage in supportive (e.”
- Residents’ support for wolf and bear conservation: the moderating influence of knowledge (2012, background): “Supporting previous studies (Pate et al. 1996; Bruskotter et al. 2009), perceived impacts were positively related to favouring predator control.”
- More than fear: role of emotions in acceptability of lethal control of wolves (2014, background): “Acceptability reflects a cognitive concept— that is, it is the outcome of a thinking process and, as such, is mediated by cognitive factors in first instance (Bruskotter et al. 2009).”
- Effects of Wolf Removal on Livestock Depredation Recurrence and Wolf Recovery in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming (2015, background): “Lethal removal is considered a necessary component of wolf management (Mech 1995) but is controversial (Cluff and Murray 1995, Reiter et al. 1999, Bruskotter et al 2009).”
- Utility of a psychological framework for carnivore conservation (2012, background): “…and risk perceptions Previous wildlife acceptance capacity studies have alluded to the strong effect that past experiences with carnivores, particularly negative interactions (e.g. livestock attack), have on preferences for carnivore population size (Riley & Decker, 2000b; Bruskotter et al., 2009).”