On the fluctuating wall-shear stress in zero pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flows
By Ramis Örlü, Philipp Schlatter. 2011
152 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6678dcc6014d21e22f7dcbd705d0736f7a16fdbe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Philipp Schlatter
- Ramis Örlü
- Iván Bermejo-Moreno
- Johan Larsson
- Julien Bodart
- Soshi Kawai
- Parviz Moin
- Haecheon Choi
In Global and Planetary Change
- Ramis Örlü
- Philipp Schlatter
- Parviz Moin
- Iván Bermejo-Moreno
- Johan Larsson
- Soshi Kawai
- Julien Bodart
- Sergio Pirozzoli
In Mechanical Engineering
- Philipp Schlatter
- Ramis Örlü
- Johan Larsson
- Soshi Kawai
- Parviz Moin
- Iván Bermejo-Moreno
- Julien Bodart
- Haecheon Choi
Citations in the corpus
- Turbulent boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers: inflow length and tripping effects (2012, methodology): “…irrespective of tripping mechanism, the curves also indicate a fast convergence towards the classical value of 0.4 (Alfredsson et al. 1988) with a small increase with Reynolds number, coming from the growing influence of the outer spectral peak as recently documented by Örlü & Schlatter (2011).”
- Large eddy simulation with modeled wall-stress: recent progress and future directions (2016, background): “Likewise, fluctuations of the wall shear-stress (found to exceed five times the mean value by Örlü & Schlatter, 2011) can severely affect the solid wall structure in some applications (e.g., mobilization of particles resting on the wall surface).”
- Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimates revisited (2012, background): “(2.7), the first term is largest: the ratios of second and third terms to the first one are much less than 1 (e.g., the ratio of second to first terms is about 0.16), but they increase weakly with the Reynolds number (Hu et al. 2006; Örlü & Schlatter 2011).”