Don't judge species on their origins

By Mark A. Davis, M. Chew, Richard J. Hobbs, A. Lugo, J. Ewel, G. Vermeij, James H. Brown, M. Rosenzweig, M. Gardener, Scott P Carroll and 9 more. Nature, 2011

972 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66458d4caec0f1e008500eb6b3a1c5de68251dfe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species (2014, neutral): “In addition, evidence is growing for the importance of choosing tree species that are representative of different functional groups based on adaptive traits (Davis et al., 2011; Aerts and Honnay, 2011; Laughlin, 2014).”
Impacts of invasive biota in forest ecosystems in an aboveground–belowground context (2017, background): “The relatively weak and inconsistent overall effect of invasive plants on many ecosystem properties as shown in synthetic studies could emerge either because invasive organisms are comparatively unimportant (Davis et al. 2011) or because there is high context-dependency in the effects of invaders wi”
Another call for the end of invasion biology (2013, background): “…that precludes native species; however, the ﬁ eld has generally not been willing to consider native species under the umbrella of invasive species (but see Davis and Th ompson 2000, Davis et al. 2001, 2011, Val é ry et al. 2008, 2009, Th ompson and Davis 2011a, Carey et al. 2012 for exceptions).”
Rabbits: manageable environmental pests or participants in new Australian ecosystems? (2012, background): “This example might be seen as supporting the principle outlined by Davis et al. (2011) of not judging species by their origins.”
Does the biogeographic origin of species matter? Ecological effects of native and non‐native species and the use of origin to guide management (2016, background): “…(Ellis et al. 2010) and changing conservation priorities (Hobbs, Higgs & Harris 2009; Mace 2014) has led some to question the utility of management based on the biogeographic origin of species (Davis et al. 2011) and the field of invasion ecology in general (Val ery, Fritz & Lefeuvre 2013).”
Dealing with non-native species: what makes the difference in South America? (2012, background): “…not every introduced species produces negative impacts to native biodiversity and that many of them can even provide economical and social benefits (Davis et al. 2011), it is important to be vigilant of introductions and to support management actions for non-native species that might alter native…”
A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment (2012, background): “Keywords: biome, invasive plants, islands, prediction, resident biota, soil resources, species diversity, species traits Received 22 August 2011; revised version received 10 November 2011 and accepted 24 December 2011”
Coping with the Lionfish Invasion: Can Targeted Removals Yield Beneficial Effects? (2012, background): “…throughout the Caribbean region and a contribution to the broader debate about the potential value of efforts to eradicate or control invaders that are established (Simberloff, 2009; Davis et al., 2011; Alyokhin, 2011; Lerdau and Wickham, 2011; Lockwood et al., 2011; Simberloff et al., 2011).”