Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative

By Jérôme Euzenat, Malgorzata Mochól, Pavel Shvaiko, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Ondřej Šváb, V. Svátek, W. V. Hage, Mikalai Yatskevich. 2007

692 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/663f52948bdfc80ebec0a7aee00a9f8e6da2bca1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Ming Mao
2. Lorena Otero-Cerdeira
3. Daniel Faria
4. Catia Pesquita
5. Daniel Rubin
6. Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Martínez
7. Nigam H. Shah
8. Alma María Gómez-Rodríguez

Citations in the corpus

• Ontology Matching: State of the Art and Future Challenges (2013, background): “This request is a set of terms covering spatial ( Trento ) and temporal ( January 2011 ) aspects to be addressed while looking for a specific theme, that is of hydrogra-phy .”
• Ontology matching: A literature review (2015, background): “As happens with Hertuda, HotMatch is also a young system developed from 2012 up to date (Dang et al., 2012b; Grau et al., 2013), hence, new versions and enhancements are to be expected.”
• Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods (2016, background): “This has been done in other fields of the semantic web as well, such as for schema and instance matching [17], reasoning [6], or question answering [14].”
• Ontology Mapping: An Information Retrieval and Interactive Activation Network Based Approach (2007, background): “The results from OAEI ontology matching campaign 20061 show the PRIOR is promising and competitive to all other approaches in different tracks, namely benchmark, web directory, food, and anatomy [5].”
• Ontology Matching with Semantic Verification (2009, unknown): “As mentioned in the OAEI 2008 results [7], ASMOV was one of the three best performing systems; this mirrors our success during the OAEI 2007 evaluations [13].”
• Biomedical ontologies: a functional perspective (2007, background): “These tools perform with varying effectiveness [57] and none of them are perfect.”
• Ten Challenges for Ontology Matching (2008, background): “Then, unique OAEI campaigns occurred in 2005 [2], 2006 [24], 2007 [22] and at the moment of writing of this paper OAEI-2008 is under way.”
• Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2014 (2014, unknown): “OA4QA OWL =, <= [0 1] open EN im-identity OWL = [0 1] blind EN, IT √”
• The AgreementMakerLight Ontology Matching System (2013, methodology): “We evaluated AML on the Anatomy and Large Biomedical Ontologies tracks of the OAEI 2012 [1].”