Ontology Matching: State of the Art and Future Challenges
By Pavel Shvaiko, Jérôme Euzenat. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2013
1,320 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71219c274777ea42e79180d05a9a377690207e07
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Pavel Shvaiko
- Jérôme Euzenat
- Partha P. Talukdar
- Cássia Trojahn dos Santos
- Heiko Paulheim
- Bernardo Cuenca Grau
- Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Martínez
- Lorena Otero-Cerdeira
In Information Systems
- Pavel Shvaiko
- Jérôme Euzenat
- Cássia Trojahn dos Santos
- Heiko Paulheim
- Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Martínez
- Lorena Otero-Cerdeira
- Alma María Gómez-Rodríguez
- Mas Rina Mustaffa
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Mas Rina Mustaffa
- Shyamala C. Doraisamy
- Alfian Abdul Halin
- Mohsen Zand
- Jérôme Euzenat
- Pavel Shvaiko
- Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Martínez
- Lorena Otero-Cerdeira
Citations in the corpus
- Processing (2020, neutral): “One aspect of transfer and generalization is from the perspective of the individual learner.”
- Ontology-Based Semantic Image Segmentation Using Mixture Models and Multiple CRFs (2016, methodology): “Using ontology matching techniques [55], these ontologies can be unified into an integrated ontology.”
- PIDGIN: ontology alignment using web text as interlingua (2013, background): “RELATED WORK Ontology Alignment has received considerable attention in prior research, please see [16] for a recent survey.”
- Ontology matching: A literature review (2015, background): “The answers provided by the practitioners for this question point out challenges that are inline with those highlighted by Euzenat and Shvaiko in Shvaiko and Euzenat (2013) and Euzenat and Shvaiko (2013).”
- Ontology Matching (2007, methodology): “In (Shvaiko and Euzenat 2013), we focussed on large-scale matching evaluation, following some leading matching systems, such as LogMap (Sect.”
- Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2014 (2014, background): “Matching evaluation still remains a challenging topic, which is worth further research in order to facilitate the progress of the field [30].”
- Semantically Enhanced Software Traceability Using Deep Learning Techniques (2017, background): “Researchers have also explored the use of knowledge bases to create and utilize semantically aware associations in the trace creation process – where a knowledge base include basic domain terms and sentences that describe the relationships between those terms [36],[27],[62].”
- Smart Factory of Industry 4.0: Key Technologies, Application Case, and Challenges (2018, background): “The semantic association between manufacturing data is established by ontology model [78].”