The Effects of Efficacy and Emotions on Campaign Involvement

By Thomas Rudolph, A. Gangl, Daniel P. Stevens. Journal of Politics, 2000

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions (2005, background): “that are beyond the scope of this article (cf. Brader 2005; Rudolph, Gangl, and Stevens 2000).”
Life Satisfaction and Political Participation: Evidence from the United States (2011, unknown): “…and empirical results by noting that different participatory acts likely have different underlying motivations (Marcus and Mackuen 1993; Rudolph et al. 2000), and that an appreciation for these differing motivations can produce a more developed set of expectations for the effect of…”
Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation (2011, methodology): “Second, this technique is common in existing work on emotions in the literature (Marcus and MacKuen 1993; Marcus et al. 2000; Rudolph et al. 2000).”
Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation (2009, background): “Rudolph et al. (2000) find internal efficacy and anxiety interact to boost attention during the 1980”
The Affect Effect of Political Satire: Sarcastic Humor, Negative Emotions, and Political Participation (2014, background): “Recent findings in political psychology that emphasize the significant interplay between negative emotions and sophistication in promoting political participation (Brader, 2006; Rudolph et al., 2000; Valentino et al., 2011) can shed light on the mechanism by which individual expertise moderates the ”