Clonal integration in Ranunculus reptans: by‐product or adaptation?

By Van Kleunen, Fischer, Schmid. 2000

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Differences in performance between genotypes of Fragaria chiloensis with different degrees of resource sharing (2003, background): “Prati & Schmid 2000; van Kleunen et al . 2000 ), in part because establishment from seed is often very rare (Klimes 2000; Verburg et al . 2000).”
On the evolution of clonal plant life histories (2001, methodology): “Significant variation among genotypes of clonal plants has been reported for the allocation to sexual and vegetative reproduction (Schmid and Weiner, 1993; Prati and Schmid, 2000), for growth form and foraging, respectively (Cheplick, 1995, 1997; Humphrey and Pyke, 1997; Skalova et al., 1997; Chepli”
The ecological significance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal effects on clonal reproduction in plants (2001, background): “…ramets, even though many vegetative cycles of the plant may have to be observed before the full effects on sexual reproductive output are also observed (Schmid et al. 1995, Gardner and Mangel 1999, Meyer and Schmid 1999 a, b, Winkler and Fischer 1999, Winkler et al. 1999, Van Kleunen et al. 2000).”
ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION OF PLASTIC FORAGING RESPONSES IN A CLONAL PLANT (2001, background): “Leaf and internodeelongation responses of shaded ramets were more strongly stimulated by clonal integration in genotypes from the landside microhabitat than in genotypes from the lakeside microhabitat (van Kleunen et al. 2000a).”