ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION OF PLASTIC FORAGING RESPONSES IN A CLONAL PLANT

By M. van Kleunen, M. Fischer. 2001

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84f82d93f76c9f8e8059de8cf9bf6710bf05ca1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. M. van Kleunen
2. Ernesto Gianoli
3. M. Fischer
4. H. de Kroon
5. J. Lenssen
6. T. Givnish
7. D. Schlaepfer
8. P. Alpert

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. van Kleunen
2. M. Fischer
3. Ernesto Gianoli
4. H. de Kroon
5. J. Lenssen
6. T. Givnish
7. P. Alpert
8. D. Schlaepfer

In Plant Science

1. M. van Kleunen
2. M. Fischer
3. T. Givnish
4. H. de Kroon
5. J. Lenssen
6. Ernesto Gianoli
7. P. Alpert
8. D. Schlaepfer

Citations in the corpus

• Environmental Heterogeneity and Population Differentiation in Plasticity to Drought in Convolvulus Chilensis (Convolvulaceae) (2005, background): “…growing under more changing environments show greater levels of plastic responses, including heterophylly degree (Cook and Johnson, 1968) and phenotypic plasticity to grass density (van Kleunen and Fischer, 2001) and soil moisture (Gianoli, 2004; but see Heschel et al., 2004 for a counterexample).”
• Preadapted for invasiveness: do species traits or their plastic response to shading differ between invasive and non‐invasive plant species in their native range? (2011, background): “…shade plasticity in the measured traits is adaptive by means of selection-gradient analysis [i.e. regression of fitness parameters on trait values in each environment separately (e.g. Dudley & Schmitt, 1996) or on plasticity of these traits across environments (e.g. van Kleunen & Fischer, 2001)].”
• Differences in performance between genotypes of Fragaria chiloensis with different degrees of resource sharing (2003, background): “The potential for local adaptation in clonal integration is supported by studies that find genetic differentiation for clonal architecture and reproductive characteristics between genotypes of the same species in sites as little as 5 m apart (Fischer et al . 2000; van Kleunen et al . 2000; van Kleu”
• Ecological constraints on the evolution of plasticity in plants (2002, background): “(1996), van Tienderen (1997), and Tufto (2000) and incorporate explicit spatial and spatio-temporal structure, so that we can analyze how rates of migration, phenotypic change, temporal variation in conditions 221”
• Local adaptation of the clonal plant Ranunculus reptans to flooding along a small‐scale gradient (2004, methodology): “Combined with earlier work on responses to competition (Prati & Schmid 2000; van Kleunen et al. 2000; van Kleunen & Fischer 2001), our results suggest that, at least for the creeping Ranunculus reptans, this trade-off may be due to stolon internode elongation: a 705 Local adaptation to flooding ©…”
• Responses of common and rare aliens and natives to nutrient availability and fluctuations (2017, unknown): “Although there are ways of testing whether plasticity is adaptive based on selection-gradient analysis (see Dudley & Schmitt 1996; van Kleunen & Fischer 2001 for one approach, and Keser et al. 2015 for another), these approaches cannot be applied in a straight-forward way to a multispecies data set…”