An advancement in cyclic plasticity modeling for multiaxial ratcheting simulation

349 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modified kinematic hardening rule for multiaxial ratcheting prediction (2004, methodology): “However, these modified models do not improve the simulation of the biaxial ratcheting responses compared with the Ohno–Wang model (Bari and Hassan, 2002).”
Ratchetting: Recent progresses in phenomenon observation, constitutive modeling and application (2008, methodology): “Bari and Hassan [58] reviewed the Chaboche model [59,60], Ohno–Wang model [61,62], McDowell model [35], Jiang–Sehitoglu model [63], Voyiadjis–Basuroychowdhury model [64] and Abdel-Karim–Ohno model [65], and demonstrated the shortcomings of such models in describing multiaxial ratchetting.”
Thermodynamic based model for the evolution equation of the backstress in cyclic plasticity (2003, positive): “…also by many authors (e.g. Duszek and Perzyna, 1991; Ohno and Wang, 1993a, b; Jiang and Kurath, 1996; Wang and Barkley, 1998, 1999; Abdel and Ohno, 2000, Voyiadjis and Basuroychowdhary, 1998; Basuroychowdhury and Voyiadjis, 1998; Geng and Wagoner, 2000; Bari and Hassan, 2002; Yaguchi et al., 2002).”
On the Ohno–Wang kinematic hardening rules for multiaxial ratcheting modeling of medium carbon steel (2005, neutral): “The primary shortcoming with the Ohno–Wang models is that they lack parameters or terms that can control the multiaxial ratcheting response (Jiang and Kurath, 1996; Bari and Hassan, 2002).”