Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories (2012, background): “Two terms have been proposed in the interactional phonetic literature to describe such cases: (i) „prosodic orientation‟ (Szczepek Reed 2006) and (ii) „phonetic upgrading‟ (Ogden 2006).”
Affectivity in conversational storytelling: An analysis of displays of anger or indignation in complaint stories (2010, background): “Prosodically, the accented syllables in 3 are produced rhythmically and 4 is produced in a hyperarticulated manner (Ogden 2006), i.”
Establishing joint decisions in a dyad (2012, background): “4) – something that certainly communicates the cantor’s independent positive evaluation of the pastor’s idea (Heritage and Raymond, 2005; Ogden, 2006).”
The Embodied and Negotiated Production of Assessments in Instructed Actions (2009, background): “Repeats concern essentially the syntactical and lexical form; second assessments can exploit prosody in order to do the upgrading (as the dealer’s “classic” [Excerpt 13, line 3] [see Ogden, 2006]).”