Investing Exhaustible Resource Rents and the Path of Consumption
By K. Hamilton, J. Hartwick. 2005
169 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/655eaa76a676225eca1207b68f2cacdf0d87d6b3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- G. Atkinson
- D. Pearce
- S. Mourato
- Richard S. J. Tol
- Cameron Hepburn
- Phoebe Koundouri
- Riccardo Scarpa
- A. Owen
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments (2006, background): “In addition, Hamilton and Hartwick (2005) and Hamilton and Withagen (2004) show that if SG is persistently greater than zero – arguably a sensible policy target in a risky world – then not only is wealth (the present value of well-being) increasing but development can, in certain circumstances,…”
- Constant Savings Rates and Quasi-Arithmetic Population Growth Under Exhaustible Resource Constraints (2007, unknown): “The reason is that the term ‘generalized Hartwick rule’ has already been given a different meaning by Dixit, Hammond and Hoel (1980), namely that the present value of net investments is constant (see also Hamilton, 1995; Asheim, Buchholz and Withagen, 2003; Hamilton and Hartwick, 2004).”