Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control

By Ulrich Mayr, Edward Awh, Paul Laurey. Nature Neuroscience, 2003

792 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/652aed56be7339589e4bc8343a461506540cfbac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Reward reduces conflict by enhancing attentional control and biasing visual cortical processing (2011, background): “No scene images appeared in consecutive trials to minimize potential priming effects (Mayr, Awh, & Laurey, 2003 ).”
The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task (2005, methodology): “It is this interaction between previous and current trial type (bconflict adaptationQ or the bGratton effectQ) on which the conflict monitoring/cognitive control model rests (Botvinick et al., 1999, 2001; Kerns et al., 2004; Mayr et al., 2003).”
Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information (2005, background): “Priming might arise from different proportions of stimulus-response repetitions (and alternations) between congruent-congruent and incongruent-incongruent trials on the one hand, and congruent-incongruent and incongruent-congruent trials on the other han”
A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. (2007, background): “Although some of the effect of incongruency in the previous trial may be due to stimulus repeat effects (Mayr et al., 2003), in the case of task switching, the effect persists even when episodic stimulus repeats are eliminated in the sequence of interest (Goschke, 2000).”
Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain (2007, background): “No direct repetitions of identical stimuli were included in the task in order to avoid potential repetition priming effects (Mayr et al., 2003), and trial types were counterbalanced across responses.”
Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. (2006, background): “…resolution trials entailed a repetition of an incongruent stimulus, which does not occur on low conflict resolution trials, it remained a possibility that repetition priming rather than conflict resolution could mediate faster reaction times in high conflict resolution trials (Mayr et al., 2003).”
Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control (2007, background): “, 2004) and possibly with top-down control processes that help to overcome such conflict (Mayr et al., 2003).”
Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. (2004, positive): “For instance, there is evidence that at least substantial portions of NEGATIVE PRIMING [30], ‘automatic route suppression’ in the FLANKER-COMPATIBILITY EFFECT [31] and the SIMON EFFECT [32] are actually produced by the impact of event files formed in the previous trial (see [33, 34 ,35] for feature-”
Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. (2004, background): “Recent research has demonstrated (pace [ 61 ]) that such sequence effects cannot be attributed entirely to perceptual or motor priming [62].”
Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes (2011, background): “Avast library of experimental designs illustrate precisely the types of steps that can be taken to eliminate the influence of cooccurring phenomena, and there is little reason why similar approaches could not be adopted to examine differences between language groups (Akcay & Hazeltine, 2007, 2008; F”