Portfolio Salience and the Proportionality of Payoffs in Coalition Governments
By Paul V. Warwick, James N. Druckman. British Journal of Political Science, 2001
245 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6523e5328d17a155383eeae47b2771644cbc5a6a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- James N. Druckman
- Paul V. Warwick
- Guillaume R. Fréchette
- Massimo Morelli
- John H. Kagel
- Andrea Mattozzi
- Antonio Merlo
In Political Science and International Relations
- James N. Druckman
- Paul V. Warwick
- John H. Kagel
- Guillaume R. Fréchette
- Massimo Morelli
- Antonio Merlo
- Andrea Mattozzi
Citations in the corpus
- The portfolio allocation paradox: An investigation into the nature of a very strong but puzzling relationship (2006, background): “Only very recently has any systematic attempt been made to take portfolio salience into account when testing the relationship ( Warwick & Druckman 2001 ), and the estimation of portfolio salience in that study, for want of better alternatives, depended on assumptions that might be termed ‘heroic’.”
- The Conditional Impact of Incumbency on Government Formation (2010, unknown): “Empirical studies of portfolio allocation have generally supported Gamson’s law (Browne and Franklin, 1973; Browne and Frendreis, 1980; Warwick and Druckman, 2001), although research has shown a tendency for large parties to be slightly undercompensated in their share of ministries.”
- The missing piece: Measuring portfolio salience in Western European parliamentary democracies (2005, methodology): “…& Feste 1975; Budge & Keman 1990; Laver & Hunt 1992; Müller & Strøm 2000) and to apply these measures to the analysis of payoffs (e.g., Thies 2001; Warwick & Druckman 2001), yet, as we will discuss, these attempts do not provide reliable ratings of the full set of ministries in a broad…”
- Behavioral Identification in Coalitional Bargaining: An Experimental Analysis of Demand Bargaining and Alternating Offers (2005, background): “Warwick and Druckman (2001) find a proportional relationship between portfolios held and the share of votes contributed to the winning coalition (for most specifications), roughly in support of the demand bargaining approach.”