Giving to Secular Causes by the Religious and Nonreligious: An Experimental Test of the Responsiveness of Giving to Subsidies
By Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman. 2004
165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64b1014e0fe4711f2dd223c42c0506bcde2c64de
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Gender Studies
In Sociology and Political Science
- Pamala Wiepking
- René Bekkers
- T. James
- Hanna Zagefka
- F. Handy
- Sara Konrath
- Rupert Brown
- Zachary I. Moore
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring Altruistic Behavior in Surveys: The All‐Or‐Nothing Dictator Game (2007, result): “An other study of donations in experimental games with secular charitable organizations as recipients also failed to find correlations of church attendance with giving in dictator games (Eckel and Grossman 2004).”
- The Psychology of Charitable Donations to Disaster Victims and Beyond (2015, background): “However, one caveat is that religious donors are likely to donate almost entirely to organizations within their own faith (Eckel & Grossman, 2004).”
- Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: a case study from Mauritius (2013, unknown): “…is either nonexistent (Anderson, Mellor, & Milyo, 2010; Batson, Oleson, & Weeks, 1989; Batson, Schoenrade, & Ventis, 1993; Darley & Batson, 1973; Eckel & Grossman, 2004; Grossman & Parrett, 2011; Johansson-Stenman, Mahmud, & Martinsson, 2009; Malhotra, 2010; Orbell et al., 1992; Spilka, Hood,…”
- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy (2010, background): “It makes a difference how price reductions are framed: when price reductions are presented as rebates—“when you give €1, you pay only €0.50”— they are less effective than when presented as matches—“when you give €1, we’ll add another €1”; (Bekkers, 2005; Eckel & Grossman, 2003, 2004).”
- Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money (2010, unknown): “Eckel and Grossman (2004) also failed to obtain effects of religiosity on giving in a dictator game experiment.”