Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals.

By Jonathan Haidt, M. Hersh. 2001

416 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64aaf8f4cc0ff0e60d0c637403b930302619d2d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Mapping the Moral Domain (2011, background): “…of lower social class in Brazil and the United States (Haidt et al., 1993), and conservatives in the United States (Graham, Haidt, & Nosek, 2009; Haidt & Hersh, 2001; Jensen, 1998) has revealed moral considerations beyond the individual-based concerns of harm and fairness, involving concerns…”
The motivated use of moral principles (2009, neutral): “similarly motivated (Haidt, 2001; Haidt & Hersh, 2001; Haidt, Koller, & Dias, 1993).”
The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. (2001, background): “Haidt and Hersh (2001) found the same thing when they interviewed conservatives and liberals about sexual morality issues, including homosexuality, incest, and unusual forms of masturbation.”
When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize (2007, background): “ShwederÕs three ethics were derived from a cluster analysis of moral discourse in India and the United States (data first reported in Shweder et al., 1987), and its utility was later demonstrated in studies in Brazil (Haidt et al., 1993) and the United States (Haidt and Hersh, 2001; Jensen, 1997).”
Haidt's Moral Intuitionist Theory: A Psychological and Philosophical Critique (2004, background): “In an interesting study cited by Haidt (Haidt & Hersh, 2001), politically conservative and liberal college students were interviewed about controversial sexual acts.”
The end of the end of ideology. (2006, background): “, Greenberg, Simon, Pyszczynski, Solomon, & Chatel, 1992; Hardin & Higgins, 1996; Jost et al., 2003a; Kruglanski, 2004; Landau et al., 2004). In personal, political, religious, scientific, and many other domains, what we believe is an intricate mix of what we (and our friends) want to believe and wh”
Moral Anger Is More Flexible Than Moral Disgust (2011, background): “…interpreted in light of previous findings that a purity violation without a harm component (e.g., creating and eating a steak from human tissue without hurting anyone, or sexual norm violations) nonetheless can evoke some lower amount of anger (Gutierrez & Giner-Sorolla, 2007; Haidt & Hersh, 2001).”
The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment (2006, methodology): “One challenge to the conscious-reasoning perspective comes from work by Haidt in which subjects failed to articulate sufficient justifications for their moral judgments (Haidt & Hersh, 2001).”
Emotions as Moral Amplifiers: An Appraisal Tendency Approach to the Influences of Distinct Emotions upon Moral Judgment (2011, background): “Disgust is triggered by objects or behaviors appraised as impure, and research shows that feeling disgusted by moral violations of purity, such as unusual sexual practices, predicts harsher moral criticism of those actions (e.g., Haidt & Hersh, 2001).”
Emotion and Prejudice: Specific Emotions Toward Outgroups (2007, background): “People asked to describe their spontaneous reactions toward homosexuality indicate feeling ‘disgust’ (Guth et al., 2001; Haddock, Zanna, & Esses, 1993; Haidt & Hersh, 2001).”