From theory to practice: the use of systems of innovation approach in innovation policy

By Cristina Chaminade, Charles Edquist. 2005

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/647c9091d966e740df3786a91b7528672dbe5a4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know (2016, background): “12 • the emergence of the concept of national systems of innovation (Freeman, 1987; Lundvall, 1992; Nelson, 1993), and later regional and sectoral systems of innovation (SI); the policy implications of these developments have been explored by authors such as Smits and Kuhlmann (2004), Chaminade and ”
INNOVATION POLICIES FOR DEVELOPMENT: TOWARDS A SYSTEMIC EXPERIMENTATION- BASED APPROACH (2009, background): “…that are not considered profitable by large pharmaceutical companies despite the huge impact they will have on the population of poor countries 4 Chaminade and Edquist, 2006) governments are supposed to design innovation policies addressing specific systemic problems within the national…”
Picking the winner? Empirical evidence on the targeting of R&D subsidies to start-ups (2012, background): “Conversely, system failures, as discussed in neoSchumpeterian approaches, are held responsible for an insufficient amount of innovative activity, also justifying certain policy measures (Chaminade and Edquist, 2005; Lundvall et al., 2002).”
Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries (2012, background): “In the context of the public sector, open innovation policies can be defined as the public actions that influence open innovation processes (Chaminade and Edquist, 2006).”
The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems (2013, background): “Indeed, as Smith (2000) has pointed out, although the neoclassical perspective does not provide an explicit definition of the concept of knowledge, it is implicit in its analysis that knowledge is considered as a synonym of information: it is generic, codified, context independent and it is consider”
Four dangers in innovation policy studies – and how to avoid them (2016, background): “…of technology have called interpretive flexibility3 – that is they 2the literature seems confused as to whether functions are a property of actors and institutions or whether instead they are a property of the system itself (see e.g. Chaminade and Edquist 2006 versus van Lente et al. 2003).”
Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failures) (2011, methodology): “This definition, moreover, is fundamental to the “activity-based” approach to studying SIs (Edquist, 2005; Edquist and Chaminade, 2006).”
What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers (2012, background): “…in order for policy makers to be able to design appropriate easures to tackle systemic failures that prevent firms from engagng in innovation activities, they need to identify why and to what xtent firms are excluded from the innovation contest (Woolthuis, 005; Chaminade and Edquist, 2006).”
Rationales for Public Policy Intervention in the Innovation Process: Systems of Innovation Approach (2010, methodology): “Despite the widespread use of the SI approach in policy-making circles, it remains a fuzzy concept - very difficult to use in practice (Chaminade and Edquist 2006) Therefore much discussion is needed on the implications of the adoption of the SI approach for public policy (what to do, when and how…”