Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failures)

By Charles Edquist. 2011

393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35ad239301471d2980833614bef5d925d8b2d82a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Policy Learning and Organizational Capacities in Innovation Policies (2011, background): “…only on the activities related to the provision of knowledge (R&D investment, and competence-building through individual skills), but also at the other sets of activities referring to demand-side activities, provision of constitutive elements, and business support services to firms (Edquist, 2008).”
Public Procurement for Innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy (2012, background): “These interactions among organizations (players) operating in different institutional contexts are important for innovation processes (Edquist, 2011).”
Innovation Policy: Rationales, Lessons and Challenges (2017, background): “…in this approach for mechanical transfer of polices from one context to another: Detailed studies of the workings of the national innovation system will be required to determine what the ‘problems’ facing policymakers are and what the appropriate policy response may be (Edquist, 2011).9 Box 2.”
The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments (2013, background): “What is important is the division of labor between private and public organizations with regard to the performance of each of the activities [17].”
Innovation policy: What, why, and how (2017, background): “Subsequently, the provision of these various factors, which are often seen as complementary, has in the innovation-systems literature invariably been labelled functions, processes, or activities (Edquist, 2004; Bergek et al. , 2008 a ; Hekkert and Negro, 2009; Weber and Truffer, 2017, this issue).”
R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know (2016, background): “…networks and open innovation; • a shift in focus from market failure to systemic failure, bringing a changed rationale for public intervention (see e.g. Edquist 2001, 2011; Braun 2005; Laranja, Uyarra, and Flanagan 2008; Dodgson et al. 2011; Gustafsson and Autio 2011); • the growing…”
Compulsive policy-making—The evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power (2014, background): “, 2012) and has suggested a number of ‘functions’ or ‘key processes’ policy makers should support to overcome these issues (e.g., Bergek et al., 2008; Edquist, 2011; Hekkert et al., 2007).”
Quadruple helix as a network of relationships: creating value within a Swedish regional innovation system (2019, background): “(Cunningham, Menter, and O’Kane 2018; Edquist 2011; H€ oglund and Linton 2018; McAdam et al. 2012). As Kriz, Bankins, and Molloy (2018) state, it is important to delve deeper into the micro aspects of relationships in the quadruple helix model to”