Culture influences on emotional responses to on-line store atmospheric cues

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

RETRACTED: Stimulus organism response model based analysis on consumers’ online impulse buying behavior (2020, background): “6 However, there is still a lack of literature for store atmosphere to affect consumer behavior.”
Internet banking acceptance model: Cross-market examination (2010, background): “This represents a serious research gap as consumer responses have been demonstrated to vary between cultures (Davis et al., 2008).”
The influence of culture, emotions, intangibility, and atmospheric cues on online behavior (2014, background): “The low task cues, which are the site descriptors inconsequential to the completion of the shopping task, are rated as more helpful for collectivistic customers (Davis et al., 2008).”
The interactional effects of atmospherics and perceptual curiosity on emotions and online shopping intention (2010, background): “Donovan and Rossiter (1982) was the first to apply the S–O–R framework into a retail context. When applied in retail setting, the stimuli are operationalized as the atmospheric cues, organism as emotional and cognitive states of consumers, and response as approach/avoidance behaviors (Donovan & Ross”
The impact of online store environment cues on purchase intention: Trust and perceived risk as a mediator (2008, methodology): “Web site awareness and web site image were assessed by four item measures each adopted from Aaker (1996) and Davis et al. (2007)).”