A Psychometric Comparison of Four Measures of Hope and Optimism

By L. Steed. 2002

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64686762e810fa7f1b5a5b959bfd1516328c716c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. T. Bailey
2. M. B. Frisch
3. Winnie Eng
4. Magali Cariou
5. C. R. Snyder
6. Eric Raufaste
7. Stéphane Vautier
8. A. Hirschi

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Magali Cariou
2. C. R. Snyder
3. T. Bailey
4. Winnie Eng
5. Eric Raufaste
6. Stéphane Vautier
7. M. B. Frisch
8. A. Hirschi

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. Magali Cariou
2. C. R. Snyder
3. T. Bailey
4. Winnie Eng
5. Eric Raufaste
6. Stéphane Vautier
7. M. B. Frisch
8. A. Hirschi

Citations in the corpus

• Hope and optimism as related to life satisfaction (2007, background): “Alphas of positively worded items (LOT-RO) and negatively worded items (LOT-RP) ranged from 0.70 to 0.80 (Bryant & Cvengros, 2004; Steed, 2002).”
• Dimensionality of the Revised Life Orientation Test and the status of filler items (2003, methodology): “One-factor models Scheier et al. (1994) and Steed (2002) presented a one-factor model, yet with correlated errors.”