Dimensionality of the Revised Life Orientation Test and the status of filler items
By Stéphane Vautier, Eric Raufaste, Magali Cariou. 2003
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e0f5a033d8c7f77f7a1e2c46ca08a7203b7fd2c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Lisa Marks Woolfson
- K. Schweizer
- Wolfgang A. Rauch
- Helfried Moosbrugger
- Kathy Brady
- Malte Friese
- Wilhelm Hofmann
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- An investigation of factors impacting on mainstream teachers’ beliefs about teaching students with learning difficulties (2009, methodology): “Although the LOT‐R was designed as a unidimensional scale and there has been support for a one‐factor model (eg, Vautier, Raufaste, & Carious, 2003 ), there is also evidence for a bidimensional model which looks at optimism and pessimism separately (eg, Robinson‐Whelen, Kim, MacCallum, & Kiecolt‐Gl”
- Method effects due to social desirability as a parsimonious explanation of the deviation from unidimensionality in LOT-R scores (2007, methodology): “In this line of reasoning the lack of fit to a unidimensional model is explained by method effects (Vautier et al., 2003).”