Moment-By-Moment Reading of Proverbs in Literal and Nonliteral Contexts

By Albert N. Katz, Todd R Ferretti. 2001

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Salience and Context Effects: Two Are Better Than One (2001, background): “Stimulus presentation resembled a moving window (cf. Katz & Ferretti, 2001/this issue) in which the sentence contexts were displayed word by word across the computer screen at a pace established previously for each participant (see following Pretest section).”
Literal Bases for Metaphor and Simile (2001, unknown): “…section we note how our analysis integrates ideas developed by Glucksberg and Keysar (1990), ideas about “salience” of features (Giora, 1997; Katz & Ferretti, 2001/this issue; Ortony, 1979; Peleg, Giora, & Fein, 2001/this issue), ideas about the nature of the comparison process (Chiappe,…”
Are There Necessary Conditions for Inducing a Sense of Sarcastic Irony? (2012, methodology): “…approach has been instantiated has been with constraint satisfaction models—a position we have taken for other instances of non-literal language (e.g., see Katz & Ferretti, 2001), along with data emerging in the more general language comprehension literature (e.g., SpiveyKnowlton & Sedivy, 1995).”
Metaphor Comprehension: What Makes a Metaphor Difficult to Understand? (2002, result): “A comparison with the constraint satisfaction model of Katz & Ferretti (2001), on the other hand, points out a limitation of the present model: the spreading activation process (see the example in the Appendix) considers only semantic constraints, while Katz & Ferretti want to consider a broader…”