Literal Bases for Metaphor and Simile

By Dan Chiappe, John M. Kennedy. 2001

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e91e5011aa1de911e6af456a84cf9ca2b3d1dae7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Zachary Estes
2. Lara L. Jones
3. Dedre Gentner
4. Brian F. Bowdle
5. Paul H. Thibodeau
6. Frank H. Durgin
7. Gerard Steen
8. Elena Semino

In Social Psychology

1. Zachary Estes
2. Lara L. Jones
3. Dedre Gentner
4. Paul H. Thibodeau
5. Frank H. Durgin
6. Joerg Zinken
7. Gerard Steen
8. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.

Citations in the corpus

• Convention, Form, and Figurative Language Processing (2001, background): “…number of researchers have proposed that metaphors are best treated as categorization statements rather than as comparison statements (e.g., Glucksberg & Keysar, 1990; Glucksberg, McGlone, & Manfredi, 1997; Honeck, Kibler, & Firment, 1987; Kennedy, 1990—but see Chiappe & Kennedy, 2001/this issue).”
• Roosters, robins, and alarm clocks : Aptness and conventionality in metaphor comprehension (2006, result): “Moreover, as shown in Table 1, several other studies have found that aptness predicts metaphor preference (Chiappe & Kennedy, 1999, 2001; Chiappe et al., 2003; Chiappe, Kennedy, & Smykowski, 2003; Utsumi & Kuwabara, 2005).”