Pavitt'S Taxonomy Sixteen Years On: A Review Article
By Daniele Archibugi. 2001
211 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/642ff05ac16ea9d80465af0274c465dfcc8d311b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- D. Wilson
- Simon Collinson
- Jochen Markard
- Fulvio Castellacci
- Martin Srholec
- Bernhard Truffer
- J. Fagerberg
- Mariana Mazzucato
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation (2008, background): “…regimes, the distinct trajectories followed by industrial sectors, and the related web of vertical linkages that tie together sector-specific regimes and trajectories in the national system of innovation (Archibugi, 2001; Laursen and Meliciani, 2002; Marsili and Verspagen, 2002; Malerba, 2002).”
- High-Tech Exports from Developing Countries: A Symptom of Technology Spurts or Statistical Illusion? (2007, background): “A number of taxonomies classifying industries according to technology, science and skills intensity, sources of competitive advantage or general character of innovation processes have been proposed over the years (see Archibugi 2001; Peneder 2003 for recent overviews).”
- Transformation of Infrastructures: Sector Characteristics and Implications for Fundamental Change (2011, background): “However, they might develop further into information-intensive firms relying on advanced data processing that can be found in banking or tourism, for example (Archibugi 2001).”
- THE INNOVATION†EMPLOYMENT NEXUS: A CRITICAL SURVEY OF THEORY AND EMPIRICS (2016, unknown): “…(CC) (rooted in process innovation) and technological competitiveness (TC) (rooted in product innovation) on employment change (see also Pianta, 2001) differentiating manufacturing and services sectors according to a revised Pavitt taxonomy (see Pavitt, 1984 and Archibugi, 2001 for a review).”
- Inertia in Japanese Organizations: Knowledge Management Routines and Failure to Innovate (2006, background): “The fact that Pavitt’s approach fails to capture this shift reflects one of its main weaknesses, as argued by Archibugi (2001).”