Leading Up the Lexical Garden Path: Segmentation and Ambiguity in Spoken Word Recognition

By Matthew H. Davis, William D. Marslen-Wilson, M. Gareth, Gaskell, Lorraine K Tyler, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Kathleen Rastle, Lolly Tyler, Billi Randall, T. Loucas. 2002

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/642f37871e9e439eb12398d1389c665c791f09e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing (2008, background): “Moreover, recent evidence suggests proximal prosodic (e.g., fundamental frequency and/or durational) cues affect lexical access and competition (Christophe, Peperkamp, Pallier, Block, & Mehler, 2004; Cutler & Donselaar, 2001; Davis, Marslen-Wilson, & Gaskell, 2002; Gout, Christophe, & Morgan, 2004”
Prosodic cues for morphological complexity in Dutch and English (2005, result): “Similar results were obtained by Davis, Marslen-Wilson, and Gaskell (2002).”
Processing resyllabified words in French (2003, unknown): “Recent findings on the recognition of words embedded in the onset of longer words and of those longer words (e.g., cap and captain; Davis, Marslen-Wilson, & Gaskell, 2002 ) and on the recognition of words in place assimilation contexts (e.g., where the /t/ in right berries may take on a bilabial pl”
Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities (2007, unknown): “…sufficient fine phonetic detail in the speech signal to establish that the base is the first constituent of a longer word well before base offset (Davis et al. 2002; Ernestus, Lahey, Verhees, & Baayen, 2006; Kemps, Ernestus, Schreuder, & 454 R. Harald Baayen, Lee H. Wurm and Joanna…”
Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography (2008, background): “The literature on the segmentation and identification of words in connected speech has long grappled with an analogous problem both for adult performance (ie, how do listeners recognise words in connected speech given the paucity of bottom-up segmentation cues in speech?; eg, Davis, Marslen-Wilson, ”
Eight questions about spoken-word recognition (2007, methodology): “Unless of course your cold-call or time-keeper predilections are different from mine.”
Hierarchical Processing in Spoken Language Comprehension (2003, unknown): “1a) (Davis et al., 2002).”
The surprising power of statistical learning: When fragment knowledge leads to false memories of unheard words (2009, background): “However, while adults (Christophe, Peperkamp, Pallier, Block, & Mehler, 2004; Davis, Marslen-Wilson, & Gaskell, 2002 ) and older infants (Gout, Christophe, & Morgan, 2004) can use these discrimination abilities for segmenting words from fluent speech, it remains an open question whether this is als”