Are the Short and Long Forms of the Young Schema Questionnaire Comparable and How Well Does Each Version Predict Psychopathology Scores?

By Lusia L. Stopa, P. Thorne, A. Waters, J. Preston. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2001

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Multiple Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Young Schema-Questionnaire in a Dutch Clinical versus Non-clinical Population (2006, background): “Alpha levels of most scales of both forms were adequate (a > .70), but significant mean differences between the YSQ-L and YSQ-S were found on 5 to 6 scales by Waller and colleagues (2001), and on 3 scales by Stopa et al. (2001).”
Schema Theory and Schema Therapy in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: A Review (2011, methodology): “Welburn et al. (2002) 203 Mixed clinical Abandonment Abandonment Vulnerability to Harm or Illness Failure Emotional Inhibition Stopa et al. (2001) 69 Mixed Axis I Abandonment Glaser et al. (2002) 141 Mixed clinical Abandonment Abandonment Vulnerability to Harm or Illness McGinn et al. (2005) 55 60% ”
Early Maladaptive Schemas as Moderators of the Impact of Stressful Events on Anxiety and Depression in University Students (2012, background): “Although the findings have been mixed, studies have generally shown that the emotional deprivation, abandonment, failure, and defectiveness schemas are more present in depression (e.g. Calvete et al. 2005; Harris and Curtin 2002; Oei and Baranoff 2007; Petrocelli et al. 2001; Schmidt et al. 1995; Sh”