Stimuli–organism-response framework: A meta-analytic review in the store environment

By Valter Afonso Vieira. 2013

427 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64107dd13d2208c22f0a6a9faaab3d2a0667b1a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

The impact of emotions on shopping behavior during epidemic. What a business can do to protect customers (2020, background): “This results from the belief that a given event can facilitate or hinder one's goal achievements (Vieira, 2013).”
Psychological contract violation and customer intention to reuse online retailers: Exploring mediating and moderating mechanisms (2017, background): “(Vieira, 2013), this approach has been criticised as being too narrow in scope (Eroglu,Machleit, & Davis, 2001).”
Travel for Affection: A Stimulus-Organism-Response Model of Honeymoon Tourism Experiences (2021, background): “…widely adopted as a framework for examining consumers’ experiences in diverse research settings including education (Goi et al., 2018), retailing (Vieira, 2013), and hospitality and tourism (Lam et al., 2011), as it provides an integrative theoretical approach that incorporates environmental…”
Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: The stimulus-organism-response approach (2020, methodology): “In this study, we employed the S-O-R framework as an overarching theory, as previous researchers demonstrated its predictive power in how retail consumers react to novel environmental stimuli (Gao and Bai, 2014; Mehrabian and Russell, 1974; Vieira, 2013; Xu et al., 2014).”
Attention, emotions and cause-related marketing effectiveness (2015, neutral): “Autonomic reactions may escape surveys and rationalised intentions, yet they are known to influence the final purchasing choice (Poels and Dewitte, 2006; Vieira, 2013).”
What motivates Chinese consumers to avoid information about the COVID-19 pandemic?: The perspective of the stimulus-organism-response model (2020, background): “First, the results indicate that consumers might be exposed to an overstimulating environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Threatening information and efforts to process an information overload trigger a set of negative psychological states, such as sadness, anxiety, and cognitive dissonance. To al”