1.65 Micron (H Band) Surface Photometry of Galaxies. VI. The History of Star Formation in Normal Late-Type Galaxies

By A. Boselli, G. Gavazzi, J. Donas, M. Scodeggio. 2000

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We have collected a large body of near-IR (H band), UV (2000 Å), and Hα measurements of late-type galaxies. These are used jointly with spectral evolutionary synthesis models to study the initial mass function (IMF) in the mass range m > 2 M⊙. For spirals (Sa–Sd), Magellanic irregulars (Im), and blue compact dwarfs, our determination is consistent with a Salpeter IMF with an upper mass cutoff Mup ∼ 80 M⊙. The history of star formation and the amount of total gas (per unit mass) of galaxies are found to depend primarily on their total masses (as traced by the H-band luminosities) and, only secondarily, on morphological type. The present star formation activity of massive spirals is up to 100 times smaller than that averaged over their lifetime, while in low-mass galaxies it is comparable to or higher than that at earlier epochs. Dwarf galaxies presently have larger gas reservoirs per unit mass than massive spirals. The efficiency in transforming gas into stars and the timescale for gas depletion (∼10 Gyr) are independent of the luminosity and morphological type. This evidence is consistent with the idea that galaxies are coeval systems, that they evolved as closed boxes, forming stars following a simple, universal star formation law whose characteristic timescale is small (τ ∼ 1 Gyr) in massive spirals and large (τ > 10 Gyr) in low-mass galaxies. A similar conclusion was drawn by Gavazzi & Scodeggio in 1996 to explain the color-magnitude relation of late-type galaxies. The consequences of this interpretation on the evolution of the star formation rate and the gas density per comoving volume of the universe with look-back time are discussed.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63fbc3ba184459fca3594986560ceb234d3f7fd3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. C. Conroy
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. Robert C. Kennicutt Jr.
  6. R. Somerville
  7. T. Heckman
  8. Simon D. M. White

In Instrumentation

  1. C. Conroy
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. T. Heckman
  7. R. Somerville
  8. A. Renzini

Citations in the corpus