On the Independence of Compliance and Reliance: Are Automation False Alarms Worse Than Misses?

By Stephen R. Dixon, C. Wickens, J. McCarley. Hum. Factors, 2007

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63c8e77b7dca536ef461f53fdf88f2c9d548393b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Sara E. McBride
2. Wendy A. Rogers
3. Arthur D. Fisk
4. Angelia L. Sebok
5. Poornima Madhavan
6. Masooda N. Bashir
7. Kevin A. Hoff
8. Justin G. Hollands

In Surgery

1. Wendy A. Rogers
2. Arthur D. Fisk
3. C. Wickens
4. Poornima Madhavan
5. Sara E. McBride
6. M. Staal

Citations in the corpus

• Trust in Automation (2015, background): “, 2010; Dixon, 2007; Dixon & Wick-ens, 2006; Levinthal & Wickens, 2006; Rice, 2009).”
• Trust and Reliance on an Automated Combat Identification System (2009, background): “Lu Wang and Greg A. Jamieson, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and Justin G. Hollands, Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto,”
• Complacency and Automation Bias in the Use of Imperfect Automation (2015, background): “…pronounced the first time an automation failure occurs (Wickens, Hooey, Gore, Sebok, & Koenicke, 2009), and automation false alarms have been observed to be generally more serious than automation misses, often leading to a subsequent disregard of future alarms that may be true (Dixon et al., 2007).”
• Are Well-Calibrated Users Effective Users? Associations Between Calibration of Trust and Performance on an Automation-Aided Task (2015, unknown): “This design provides us with greater experimental control and is consistent with past research (e.g., Dixon & Wickens, 2006; Dixon, Wickens, & McCarley, 2007; Rice, 2009).”
• The Role of Trust as a Mediator Between System Characteristics and Response Behaviors (2015, background): “Researchers have elaborated on the underlying processes of trust by describing compliance and reliance behaviors in response to systems that are either false alarm prone (FP) or miss prone (MP; Dixon et al., 2007).”
• Understanding human management of automation errors (2013, background): “Dixon, Wickens, and McCarley (2007) also found that misses were associated with greater detection of system failures than false alarms as measured by d 0 .”