Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.
By Jessica Maye, Janet F. Werker, L. Gerken. Cognition, 2002
1,289 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cultural Studies, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63c46b96f402cda632552b114fc2e53b9be8c243
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cultural Studies
- Janet F. Werker
- Patricia K. Kuhl
- Chia-ying Lee
- Jenny R. Saffran
- Amanda Seidl
- Okko Johannes Räsänen
- H. H. Yeung
- Eugene Buckley
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Janet F. Werker
- Patricia K. Kuhl
- Okko Johannes Räsänen
- Chia-ying Lee
- Takao K. Hensch
- Ferran Pons
- Jenny R. Saffran
- David J. Lewkowicz
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Janet F. Werker
- Patricia K. Kuhl
- Ferran Pons
- Takao K. Hensch
- Okko Johannes Räsänen
- Jenny R. Saffran
- David J. Lewkowicz
- Nina Kraus
Citations in the corpus
- Cognitive Science in the era of Artificial Intelligence: A roadmap for reverse-engineering the infant language-learner (2016, neutral): “This example reveals that contrary to the hypothesis in Maye et al. (2002), finding phonetic units is not only a problem of constructing categories (clustering), it is also a problem of segmenting continuous speech.”
- PRIMIR: A Developmental Framework of Infant Speech Processing (2005, background): “Taken together, the Maye et al. (2002) and Anderson et al. (2003) studies showed that infants use both distributional and frequency information in the input to restructure their phonetic categories.”
- Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. (2008, background): “As we have already suggested, the knowledge necessary to compute likelihoods is probably initially acquired in infancy, as a result of exposure to the distribution of phonetic variability of phonological categories in the language the infant hears (Maye et al., 2002).”
- Brain Mechanisms in Early Language Acquisition (2010, background): “As reviewed, infants show robust learning effects in statistical learning studies when tested in the laboratory with very simple stimuli (Maye et al., 2002, 2008; Saffran et al., 1996).”
- Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e) (2008, background): “Young infants learn 'statistically' (Saffran 2002) at many levels, including phonetic (Kuhl et al. 1992; Maye et al. 2002, in press), phonotactic ( Jusczyk et al. 1993, 1994), lexical (Goodsitt et al. 1993; Saffran et al. 1996) and syntactic (Gomez & Gerken 1999, 2000; Marcus et al. 1999; Peñ a et…”
- Is speech learning 'gated' by the social brain? (2007, background): “Thus, the presence of a human being interacting with the infant during language exposure, while not required for simpler statistical-learning tasks (Maye et al ., 2002; Saffran et al ., 1996), is critical for learning in our natural language-learning situation in which infants heard, on average,…”
- The Infant's Auditory World: Hearing, Speech, and the Beginnings of Language (2007, background): “Tallal and her colleagues (Tallal, Miller, Jenkins, & Merzenich, 1997; Tallal & Piercy, 1973, 1974) have long argued that a deficit in auditory temporal resolution is the underlying cause of specific language impairment. Wright et al. (1997) collected psychophysical data from children with language ”
- Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. (2006, background): “Natural phonetic learning may require a social context, despite the fact that simple (and likely short-term) phonetic learning can be demonstrated in the absence of a social context (e.g. Maye et al., 2002).”
- Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code (2004, background): “So, distributional patterns of sounds provide clues about the phonemic structure of a languag”
- The development of phonetic representation in bilingual and monolingual infants (2007, background): “One account of phonological reorganization holds that infants keep track of the distributional frequencies of sounds in the language environment, using them to guide perception ( Maye, Werker, & Gerken, 2002 ).”
- Discovering linguistic structures in speech: models and applications (2014, background): “As pointed out in [96, 124, 88, 160, 159, 64], success in some sub-problems of the language acquisition procedure relies on infants’ sensitivity to the distributional patterns of sounds in a language.”
- Chinese and English Infants' Tone Perception: Evidence for Perceptual Reorganization (2006, result): “Such a finding would be consistent with the results of a study by Maye, Werker, and Gerken (2002) , who found that after just a few minutes of exposure to a novel language, infants’ sensitivity to the phonetic categories of that language improved.”