Enhanced Sampling Techniques in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biological Systems

By R. Bernardi, Marcelo C. R. Melo, Klaus Schulten. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2014

683 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background Molecular Dynamics has emerged as an important research methodology covering systems to the level of millions of atoms. However, insufficient sampling often limits its application. The limitation is due to rough energy landscapes, with many local minima separated by high-energy barriers, which govern the biomolecular motion. Scope of review In the past few decades methods have been developed that address the sampling problem, such as replica-exchange molecular dynamics, metadynamics and simulated annealing. Here we present an overview over theses sampling methods in an attempt to shed light on which should be selected depending on the type of system property studied. Major Conclusions Enhanced sampling methods have been employed for a broad range of biological systems and the choice of a suitable method is connected to biological and physical characteristics of the system, in particular system size. While metadynamics and replica-exchange molecular dynamics are the most adopted sampling methods to study biomolecular dynamics, simulated annealing is well suited to characterize very flexible systems. The use of annealing methods for a long time was restricted to simulation of small proteins; however, a variant of the method, generalized simulated annealing, can be employed at a relatively low computational cost to large macromolecular complexes. General Significance Molecular dynamics trajectories frequently do not reach all relevant conformational substates, for example those connected with biological function, a problem that can be addressed by employing enhanced sampling algorithms.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63a0c997c79031d3bbc52cf0c3dee31b3f9735eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Ken A. Dill
  2. Carlos Simmerling
  3. Emiliano Brini
  4. T. Croll

In Molecular Biology

  1. Ken A. Dill
  2. Emiliano Brini
  3. Carlos Simmerling
  4. T. Croll

In Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

  1. Ken A. Dill

Citations in the corpus