A Perspective of Economic Geography

By A. Scott. 2004

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/638eb23ded5c3801d053e6f5a11ced7d2c673d44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Urban Studies

Citations in the corpus

Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspective 3 - toward a relational view of economic action and policy (2006, background): “Although recognizing some important progress in the work of geographical economists, many economic geographers, such as Scott (2004), do not view this as a long-term perspective of the discipline.”
Understanding the Organization of Industrial Ecosystems (2008, background): “Organizational sociology examines how social forces shape the structure and function of organizations and the interactions among groups of organizations (Scott 2004b).”
Relational Economic Geography: A Partial Understanding or a New Paradigm? (2008, background): “Economic institutions are reproduced in action, but they nevertheless have a large degree of stability (Scott 2004).”
Local And Regional Development (2006, background): “institutional agency discussed above (Martin and Sunley 1996; Scott 2004).”
The Structure, Function, and Evolution of a Regional Industrial Ecosystem (2009, background): “Economic geography examines the reasons for the concentration of particular industries in certain regions, the organizational dynamics among businesses, and the advantages for companies and human populations located in these systems (Scott 2004).”
Regional Development in China: Transitional Institutions, Embedded Globalization, and Hybrid Economies (2007, unknown): “As many are concerned (e.g., Markusen, 1999; Scott, 2004), geographers cannot afford to abandon “totalization” and distance themselves from large policy and political issues of national and even global significance.”
The Regional Environment and a Firm’s Innovative Performance: A Plea for a Multilevel Interactionist Approach (2007, background): “This observation fits the current critical debate on the theoretical and empirical orientation of the field of economic geography (Bathelt and Glückler 2003; Martin and Sunley 2003; Maskell 2001; Overman 2004; Scott 2004; Taylor and Asheim 2001).”
Theorizing practice in economic geography: Foundations, challenges, and possibilities (2011, unknown): “…scholarship is confronted by the difficulty of effectively conceptualising the relationship between, on the one hand, the significance and meaning of micro-social actions and, on the other, larger-order structures such as institutions, social class, or culture (c.f. Scott, 2004; Sunley, 2008).”
The Firm as Social Networks: An Organisational Perspective (2005, background): “The recent emergence of “new economic geographies,” however, has challenged these pre-existing conceptions of the firm (see Barnes 2001; Lee and Wills 1997; Thrift and Olds 1996; Yeung 2003, 2005; cf. Clark, Feldman, and Gertler 2000; Scott 2004; Storper 2001).”
Institutional change in economic geography (2014, background): “Based on such dynamic processes, economic, social, and cultural relations may define a creative ‘field’ that stimulates entrepreneurship, learning, and innovation, and leads to positive spatial externalities, if concentrated in physical spaces such as regional agglomerations (Scott, 2004).”
Why do regions develop and change?: the challenge for geography and economics (2011, background): “…approach to trade costs stresses the divide between innovative or uncertainty-dominated activities and routinized ones, noting their tendency to have different organizational structures (scale and scope of firms, degree of intermediate transactions) and hence trade costs (Scott, 1988; 2004).”
Money flows like mercury: the geography of global finance (2005, background): “This should not be construed as an attack upon the utility of analytical models; I do not see the issue as an either/or choice (compare Krugman (1996) with Scott (2004)).”