Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex.
By Victor A. F. Lamme, Hans Supèr, Henk Spekreijse. 1998
Subfields: Neuroscience
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Neuroscience
- Victor A. F. Lamme
- Michael W. Spratling
- Nikos K. Logothetis
- Janneke F. M. Jehee
- Thomas Serre
- Pieter R. Roelfsema
- Randall C. O’Reilly
- Michael Pfeiffer
Citations in the corpus
- Masking Disrupts Reentrant Processing in Human Visual Cortex (2007, background): “The presence and timing (>100 msec) of contextual modulation strongly suggests that reentrant neural processing takes place going back from higher areas containing larger receptive fields to lower areas such as V1. Also, when extrastriate regions are lesioned, contextual modulation disappears, leavi”
- Reconciling Predictive Coding and Biased Competition Models of Cortical Function (2008, background): “…single-cell electrophysiological data showing enhanced neural activity resulting from attentional and contextual influences (Galuske et al., 2002; Hup´e et al., 1998; Lamme et al., 1998; Lee et al., 1998; Luck et al., 1997; McAdams and Maunsell, 2000; Reynolds et al., 1999; Zipser et al., 1996).”
- Very slow activity fluctuations in monkey visual cortex: implications for functional brain imaging. (2003, background): “The results are discussed in the context of combined fMRI/electrophysiological recordings.”
- Figure-ground modulation in awake primate thalamus (2015, methodology): “In accordance with previous work in V1 (3, 6, 38), we averaged the responses to both directions of motion before computing the FGM index.”
- On the Time Course of Visual Word Recognition: An Event-related Potential Investigation using Masked Repetition Priming (2006, background): “Lamme et al. (2002) and Lamme, Supèr, and Spekreijse (1998) argue that it is this blocking of recurrent processing that normally occurs for fully visible items, which impedes awareness of the masked item.”
- Integration of local features into global shapes: monkey and human FMRI studies. (2003, unknown): “These findings are consistent with pre- 1994; Grinvald et al., 1994; Kastner et al., 1997; Sengpiel vious neurophysiological studies (Kapadia et al., 1995, et al., 1997; Li et al., 2000; Nothdurft et al., 2000; Polat 1999; Zipser et al., 1996; Lamme et al., 1998; Polat et and Bonneh, 2000).”
- Masking Interrupts Figure-Ground Signals in V1 (2002, background): “The former kind of activity is relatively early, unaffected by masking, and, for example, also remains present when animals are anesthetized (Lamme et al., 1998b) or when animals do not see stimuli (Supèr, Spekreijse, & Lamme, 2001).”
- FigureGround Segregation in a Recurrent Network Architecture (2002, unknown): “A recent study (Lamme et al., 1998) investigated the effect of a relatively large extrastriate lesion on neuronal correlates of texture segregation in macaque area V1.”
- Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; a case for phenomenal awareness (2004, background): “With respect to that question, I have made a strong point (Lamme, 2000; Lamme & Roelfsema, 2000) of distinguishing between the so-called feedforward sweep (FFS) and recurrent processing (RP) (Lamme et al., 1998a).”
- The Limits of Feedforward Vision: Recurrent Processing Promotes Robust Object Recognition when Objects Are Degraded (2012, background): “Although feedback is commonly held to influence perception at a later time point than feedforward processing (Hochstein & Ahissar, 2002), single-cell recordings from the dorsal visual stream suggest that feedback plays a primary and immediate role in the computations that give rise to perception by ”