Augmented Reality: A Review

By Donna R. Berryman. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 2012

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Surgery, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63386143bd3b163d39d098e969096abe06b32b5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. Esther Z. Barsom
2. Marlies P. Schijven
3. Maurits Graafland
4. Philipp A. Rauschnabel

In Surgery

1. Esther Z. Barsom
2. Marlies P. Schijven
3. Maurits Graafland

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Esther Z. Barsom
2. Marlies P. Schijven
3. Maurits Graafland
4. Philipp A. Rauschnabel

Citations in the corpus

• What is XR? Towards a Framework for Augmented and Virtual Reality (2022, background): “…impact on social interaction (Miller et al., 2019), and leveraging this technology in differentiated application areas, including medical training (Berryman, 2012), tourism (Yin et al., 2021; tom Dieck & Han, 2019), manufacturing (Schein & Rauschnabel, 2021), marketing (Chylinski et al., 2020;…”
• Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers From a Modeling Perspective (2019, unknown): “[516] D.”
• Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training (2016, methodology): “Workers were guided through the use of a head-mounted display to perform electrical wiring for aircraft equipment, without having to interpret abstract diagrams in manuals, allowing performing tasks without hours of effort to study [8].”
• Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies (2018, unknown): “Although some papers such as a comprehensive literature review for Augmented Reality carried out by Berryman (2012) is mentioned, this paper mainly provides some examples of research on AR within framework of Industry 4.0.”