Performance of the forest productivity model 3-PG applied to a wide range of forest types

260 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Variance-based sensitivity analysis of a forest growth model (2012, methodology): “For the aboveground biomass, a series of allometric equations related to stem diameter at breast height (DBH) are applied to determine carbon allocation between foliage and stem (Landsberg and Waring, 1997; Landsberg et al., 2003).”
Forest Growth and Yield Modeling (2011, methodology): “The 3-PG model of Landsberg and Waring (1997) is an allometric model based on key physiological principles, and has been used in a wide range of forest types (Landsberg et al., 2003) (Figure 13.3).”
Growing Plantation Forests (2010, background): “There are other examples both of the development of process-based models and their use to map potential forest productivity over large areas (Landsberg and Waring 1997; Coops et al. 1998; Sands and Landsberg 2002; Landsberg et al. 2003; Almeida et al. 2004b, 2007; Fontes et al. 2006; Swenson et al. ”
Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis from a coupled 3-PG and soil organic matter decomposition model (2008, background): “Good agreement was also found for parameters such as the ratio of net to gross primary production (Waring et al., 1998; Landsberg et al., 2003), f N 0 (Landsberg et al., 2005; Patenaude et al., 2008), Fx (Patenaude et al., 2008) and Rttover (Landsberg et al., 2005).”
Model validation using equivalence tests (2004, methodology): “8 (Landsberg et al., 2003).”