How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums
By Fernanda Ferreira, Benjamin Swets. 2002
313 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62f436a07f645e07e44a0b6c32fd2ca3c542d28b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Albert Costa
- Sarah Brown-Schmidt
- Maryellen C. MacDonald
- Douglas J. Davidson
- Alfonso Caramazza
- Fernanda Ferreira
- Michael K. Tanenhaus
- Willem J. M. Levelt
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Albert Costa
- Sarah Brown-Schmidt
- Maryellen C. MacDonald
- Douglas J. Davidson
- Alfonso Caramazza
- Fernanda Ferreira
- Michael K. Tanenhaus
- Willem J. M. Levelt
In Statistics and Probability
- Sarah Brown-Schmidt
- Maryellen C. MacDonald
- Albert Costa
- Alfonso Caramazza
- Fernanda Ferreira
- Douglas J. Davidson
- Roger Levy
Citations in the corpus
- Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science (2005, background): “Although some investigators argue that the system is highly incremental, others have proposed that the production system attempts to plan about one clause at a time before initiating speech (Garrett 1975; Christianson and Ferreira in press; Ferreira and Swets 2002).”
- Minding the clock (2003, background): “It indicates that the counterpoint between the order of fixations and the order of words is not a prerequisite of fluent speech, and that this kind of incrementality has exceptions (see also Ferreira & Swets, 2002; van der Meulen, Meyer, & Levelt, 2001).”
- The Production of Noun Phrases in English and Spanish: Implications for the Scope of Phonological Encoding in Speech Production☆ (2002, background): “3 Ferreira and Swets (in press) have also suggested that incrementality may be under strategic control, but that the size of the planning unit cannot be smaller than one phonological word.”
- Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion (2003, unknown): “Thus, in addition to the inter-individual differences in the preferred coordination of speech planning and speech output invoked by Schriefers and Teruel (1999), there may be intra-individual variability (see also Ferreira & Swets, 2002 ).”
- Planning in sentence production: evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope. (2010, unknown): “Although there may be general agreement about incrementality , the (sub-clausal) unit of planning in language production has been a topic of considerable debate in recent years (Costa & Caramazza, 2002; Ferreira & Swets, 2002; Griffin & Bock, 2000).”
- Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning (2006, background): “Added support comes from work by Ferreira and Swets (2002) who compared utterance durations in two experiments that differed in the amount of preparation time given to speakers.”
- How language production shapes language form and comprehension (2012, background): “The scope of advance planning varies in different circumstances and is at least partially under the producer’s strategic control (Ferreira and Swets, 2002).”