Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa)in Luxembourg over a 10-year period
By L. Schley, Marc Dufrêne, A. Krier, A. Frantz. Zeitschrift f\ ur Jagdwissenschaft, 2008
265 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62dc3e18d793f02795a9f4656010c0ea2d53da74
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Small Animals
Citations in the corpus
- Using spatial Bayesian methods to determine the genetic structure of a continuously distributed population: clusters or isolation by distance? (2009, background): “For example, over 4000 wild boar were hunted in Luxembourg (area 2586 km 2 ) in 2004 (Schley et al. 2008).”
- Effects of hunting on wild boar Sus scrofa behaviour (2013, background): “Wild boar can cause significant damage to crops (Genov 1981, Feichtner 1998, Bieber & Ruf 2005, Schley et al. 2008) and is alsooneof themorepopular game species for recreational hunting (Geisser & Reyer 2004).”
- How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.? (2008, background): “…increase and dispersal into new areas is accompanied by economic problems, like high risk of epidemics and increasing agricultural damages, especially in agricultural regions (e.g. Labudzki and Wlazelko 1991; Groot Bruinderink and Hazebroek 1996; Gortázar et al. 2007; Schley et al. 2008).”
- Do cities represent sources, sinks or isolated islands for urban wild boar population structure? (2017, background): “In urban areas, the species is prone to be perceived as a nuisance due to its ability to exploit any locally abundant food source (Schley et al. 2008).”