The effect of neutrinos on the matter distribution as probed by the intergalactic medium

By M. Viel, M. Haehnelt, Volker Springel. 2010

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a suite of full hydrodynamical cosmological simulations that quantitatively address the impact of neutrinos on the (mildly non-linear) spatial distribution of matter and in particular on the neutral hydrogen distribution in the Intergalactic Medium (IGM), which is responsible for the intervening Lyman-α absorption in quasar spectra. The free-streaming of neutrinos results in a (non-linear) scale-dependent suppression of power spectrum of the total matter distribution at scales probed by Lyman-α forest data which is larger than the linear theory prediction by about 25 % and strongly redshift dependent. By extracting a set of realistic mock quasar spectra, we quantify the effect of neutrinos on the flux probability distribution function and flux power spectrum. The differences in the matter power spectra translate into a ∼ 2.5% (5%) difference in the flux power spectrum for neutrino masses with Σmν = 0.3 eV (0.6 eV). This rather small effect is difficult to detect from present Lyman-α forest data and nearly perfectly degenerate with the overall amplitude of the matter power spectrum as characterised by σ8. If the results of the numerical simulations are normalized to have the same σ8 in the initial conditions, then neutrinos produce a smaller suppression in the flux power of about 3% (5%) for Σmν = 0.6 eV (1.2 eV) when compared to a simulation without neutrinos. We present constraints on neutrino masses using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey flux power spectrum alone and find an upper limit of Σmν < 0.9 eV (2σ C.L.), comparable to constraints obtained from the cosmic microwave background data or other large scale structure probes.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62d68eb5324cb3e8325b4d48d30d3c37a9c31526

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Schneider
  2. C. Yéche
  3. N. Palanque-Delabrouille
  4. Catherine Heymans
  5. D. Weinberg
  6. Volker Springel
  7. L. Hernquist
  8. Simon D. M. White

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Lavinia Heisenberg
  2. M. Viel
  3. N. Palanque-Delabrouille
  4. C. Yéche
  5. Catherine Heymans
  6. Simeon Bird
  7. M. Haehnelt
  8. Julien Lesgourgues

Citations in the corpus