The one-dimensional Lyα forest power spectrum from BOSS

By N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Yéche, A. Borde, J. Goff, G. Rossi, M. Viel, 'Eric Aubourg, S. Bailey, Julián Bautista, M. Blomqvist and 26 more. 2013

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We have developed two independent methods for measuring the one-dimensional power spectrum of the transmitted flux in the Lyman-α forest. The first method is based on a Fourier transform and the second on a maximum-likelihood estimator. The two methods are independent and have different systematic uncertainties. Determination of the noise level in the data spectra was subject to a new treatment, because of its significant impact on the derived power spectrum. We applied the two methods to 13 821 quasar spectra from SDSS-III/BOSS DR9 selected from a larger sample of over 60 000 spectra on the basis of their high quality, high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), and good spectral resolution. The power spectra measured using either approach are in good agreement over all twelve redshift bins from ⟨z⟩ = 2.2 to ⟨z⟩ = 4.4, and scales from 0.001 km s-1 to 0.02 km s-1. We determined the methodological andinstrumental systematic uncertainties of our measurements. We provide a preliminary cosmological interpretation of our measurements using available hydrodynamical simulations. The improvement in precision over previously published results from SDSS is a factor 2–3 for constraints on relevant cosmological parameters. For a ΛCDM model and using a constraint on H0 that encompasses measurements based on the local distance ladder and on CMB anisotropies, we infer σ8 = 0.83 ± 0.03 and ns = 0.97 ± 0.02 based on H i absorption in the range 2.1 < z < 3.7.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/479bbc51c54725a20166dd0400711e8719eb36a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Schneider
  2. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  3. Will J. Percival
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. J. Tinker
  6. F. V. D. Bosch
  7. J. Brinkmann
  8. D. Weinberg

Citations in the corpus