A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity.

By R. Chaplin‐Kramer, M. O'Rourke, E. J. Blitzer, C. Kremen. Ecology Letters, 2011

944 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29d4c9fab9782f5cb5810e8aed2e4eb1371f13ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production (2019, background): “For instance, changes in richness or 158 abundance of service-providing organisms in response to land-clearing for agriculture (9, 10), 159 could alter the flow of benefits to people.”
Safe and just Earth system boundaries (2023, positive): “For example, the number of species, and abundance of species able to provide pollination or pest control services rapidly decreases with the decrease in the amount of habitat available (Kremen et al. 2004, 2007, 2012; Ricketts et al. 2008; Chaplin-Kramer et al. 2011; Tscharntke et al. 2012; Kremen 2”
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021, background): “3 in Lagisz et al. (2020) and table 1 in Chaplin-Kramer et al. (2011)].”
The benefits of hedgerows for pollinators and natural enemies depends on hedge quality and landscape context (2017, background): “, 2011) and natural enemies (Chaplin-Kramer et al., 2011), but it is becoming increasingly clear that the distribution, configuration and quality of these non-farmed components influences the extent of these benefits (Mitchell et al.”
Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats (2012, background): “…of landscape composition and proximity to edges on natural enemy abundance, composition or diversity, comparatively few actually measure the functional implications of such spillover, i.e. effects on pest suppression and crop injury levels (Bianchi et al., 2006; Chaplin Kramer et al., 2011).”
Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019, background): “, 2000), because natural enemies have been shown to benefit from increased landscape complexity (Bianchi et al., 2006; Chaplin-Kramer et al., 2011; Veres et al., 2013).”
Landscape composition and configuration differently affect trap-nesting bees, wasps and their antagonists (2014, background): “Moreover, specialists of higher trophic levels are assumed to be more vulnerable to habitat fragmentation and reduced landscape heterogeneity than their hosts (Brueckmann et al., 2011; Chaplin-Kramer et al., 2011; Holt et al., 1999; Rand et al., 2012).”