The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Determinants of Successful Pension Reform in Continental Europe

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Who is in and who is out? A risk-based conceptualization of insiders and outsiders (2013, methodology): “Note: Based on Oesch (2006) and Kitschelt and Rehm (2005); adapted from Häusermann (2010). For the classification of occupations (ISCO-2d codes) see Appendix Table 1.”
Two Decades of Change in Europe: The Emergence of the Social Investment State (2012, background): “But retrenchment is just one side of the story of what is a genuine restructuring and adaptation to demographic, economic and social structural change of pension systems (Häusermann, 2010).”
The decline of the working-class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state (2015, background): “Some work emphasizes the interpersonal profile of new middle-class occupations as fostering egalitarian and solidaristic values (Kitschelt and Rehm, 2014); others stress that the oftentimes atypical and more vulnerable occupational situation of these workers, many of whom are women, may explain thei”
The paradox of liberalization – understanding dualism and the recovery of the German political economy (2014, unknown): “Most countries’ governments have implemented reforms of labour market policy (Bonoli, 2010), unemployment insurance (Clegg, 2007) and pensions (Häusermann, 2010), altering the patterns, if not scale, of social spending and the social security position of workers.”