The Effects of Pro Forma Earnings Disclosures on Analysts' and Nonprofessional Investors' Equity Valuation Judgments
By James R. Frederickson, J. Miller. 2004
336 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/627e45bbc03956b4ca2e6646cbbc9f5707b21aa7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Theodore E. Christensen
- Mark T. Soliman
- Richard M. Frankel
- Sarah E. McVay
- Ervin L. Black
- Richard D. Mergenthaler
- Jeffrey E. Sohl
- John R. Becker-Blease
In Finance
- Mark T. Soliman
- Richard M. Frankel
- Theodore E. Christensen
- Sarah E. McVay
- Ervin L. Black
- Richard D. Mergenthaler
- D. Merkl-Davies
- John R. Becker-Blease
In General Decision Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Non-GAAP earnings and board independence (2011, background): “Hirshleifer and Teoh (2003) demonstrate analytically that nonGAAP earnings can influence investors with limited attention; consistent with this, both Frederickson and Miller (2004) and Elliott (2006) find in experimental settings that non-GAAP earnings influence nonprofessional investors and induce…”
- The Effect of Gender Diversity on Angel Group Investment (2011, background): “See Lichtenstein and Fischhoff (1981); Smith and Kida (1991); Frederickson and Miller (2004); Locke and Mann (2005); Kass, Ahlers, and Dugger (1998); Minter, Gruppen, Napolitano, and Gauger (2005); and Lundeberg, Fox, and Punćochar (1994) for evidence that training and environment can attenuate…”
- Does Search-facilitating Technology Improve the Transparency of Financial Reporting? (2004, background): “In contrast, nonprofessional investors use less-defined valuation models and assimilate financial information in a relatively unstructured manner (SRI International 1987; Frederickson and Miller 2004).”
- The Impact of Expertise and Investment Familiarity on Investors' Use of Online Financial Report Information (2006, background): “Based on these differences, Gassen (2001) argues and provides evidence that business students navigating an HTML-formatted annual report retrieve business information faster and more accurately, and are more satisfied with the way information is presented than users reading a PDF-formatted report.”
- Discretionary Disclosure Strategies in Corporate Narratives: Incremental Information or Impression Management? (2008, neutral): “…the two schools, thereby providing valuable insights into the impression management/incremental information debate [Lang and Lundholm, 2000]10; [Frederickson and Miller, 2004]; [Barton and Mercer, 2005]; [Bowen et al., 2005]; [Johnson and Schwartz, 2005], [Krische, 2005]; [Elliott, 2006];…”
- Who Uses Financial Reports and for What Purpose? Evidence from Capital Providers (2014, neutral): “In addition, they are more easily misled by pro-forma earnings disclosures and often use overly simplistic valuation models (Frederickson and Miller, 2004; Elliott, 2006).”
- Fifty-Year Overview of Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting (2011, neutral): “2011 The Authors Accounting and Finance 2011 AFAANZ Frederickson and Miller (2004) found significant differences in the use of pro forma earnings by non-professional investors and analysts.”
- The Disclosure of Non-GAAP Earnings Information in the Presence of Transitory Gains (2014, neutral): “In addition, there is evidence that investors—especially unsophisticated investors—are subject to processing costs (e.g., Frederickson and Miller 2004; Elliott 2006; Allee et al. 2007).”
- Are M.B.A. Students a Good Proxy for Nonprofessional Investors (2007, neutral): “( continued on next page ) Elliott, Hodge, Kennedy, and Pronk The Accounting Review, January 2007 TABLE 1 (Continued) Frederickson and Miller (2004) In an experiment, participants made stock price judgments based on an earnings release that reported only GAAP earnings or that reported both GAAP and…”
- Impression Management and Retrospective Sense-Making in Corporate Narratives: A Social Psychology Perspective (2011, background): “This prevent them from assessing reporting bias arising from the manipulation of the presentation and disclosure of information in corporate narrative documents (for example, Baird and Zelin 2000; Courtis 2004b; Elliott 2006; Frederickson and Miller 2004; Krische 2005).”